Home / Call
Call for Papers
Call 1: Analysis and Explication in 20th Century Philosophy
Deadline: 29 October 2018
Ever since the rise of the so-called analytic school in 20th century philosophy, philosophical analysis has often been considered to be synonymous with conceptual analysis, which in turn is usually associated with a kind of a priori probing of word-meaning that operates largely in the spirit of ordinary language philosophy.
Criticisms pertaining to issues like the paradox of analysis, the very notion of analyticity, the role of a priori reasoning, the origin of linguistic intuition, or the structure of mental representation, however, have all added to undermining confidence in the merits of conceptual analysis.
As far as the clarification of concepts is concerned, explication is therefore sometimes proposed as an alternative means. Seemingly less tied to a specific school of thought – and even less scrutinized than the concept ‘analysis’ – the notion of explication is not exempt from ambiguity; nor is it univocally acclaimed as an appropriate part of investigating philosophically interesting concepts.
For the next volume of Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy we invite submissions of new work on analytical and explicatory methods within 20th century philosophy. We seek to combine historical and systematic perspectives on philosophical methodology and especially encourage scholarship on the theories of analysis and explication as well as on central figures of 20th century analytic philosophy.
Frauke Albersmeier, Christoph Kann and David Hommen (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf) will act as Guest-Editors for this volume. For further inquiries, please contact
Call 2: Ancient Modes of Philosophical Inquiry
Deadline: 31 March 2019
At least since Socrates, philosophy has been understood as the desire for acquiring a special kind of knowledge, namely wisdom, a kind of knowledge that human beings ordinarily do not possess. According to ancient thinkers this desire may result from a variety of causes: wonder or astonishment, the painful realization that one lacks wisdom, or encountering certain hard perplexities or aporiai. As a result of this basic understanding of philosophy, Greek thinkers tended to regard philosophy as an activity of inquiry (zētēsis) rather than as a specific discipline. Discussions concerning the right manner of engaging in philosophical inquiry – what methodoi or routes of inquiry were best suited to lead one to wisdom – accordingly became an integral part of ancient philosophy, as did the question how such manners of inquiry related to, and differed from, other types of inquiry, for instance medical or mathematical.
It is the ideal of philosophy as inquiry, and the various ways in which ancient philosophers conceived of the manner in which such inquiry should be conducted, that we wish to concentrate on in this issue of Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, whose preliminary title is ‘Ancient Modes of Philosophical Inquiry’. Its aim is, broadly, to investigate the various ways in which ancient philosophers conducted their philosophical investigations, and reflected on how philosophical investigation should be conducted. In particular, we understand this topic in contra-distinction to the explicit epistemologies ancient authors have put forward (for instance, the theory Aristotle describes in his Posterior Analytics).
Please also see the extended call that includes topics we are particularly interested in.
According to the current publication plans of Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, our issue will appear in print in 2020. Since Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy is a peer-reviewed journal, we will need to receive submissions by 31 March 2019.
Jens Kristian Larsen (University of Bergen) and Philipp Steinkrüger (Ruhr-Universität Bochum) will serve as Guest-Editors for this volume. For further inquiries, please contact
Philipp Steinkrüger (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Jens Kristian Larsen (email@example.com)